Find a Plot Hole and Weak Story Logic: 5 Best Hacks
“A plot is also a narrative of events, the emphasis falling on causality.” —E. M. Forster, Aspects of the Novel
When you know your story well, you know things your reader doesn’t.
You know why your protagonist makes a particular decision. You know how one character learned an important fact. You know what happened between two events even if you never put it on the page.
Because all that information exists in your head, your brain can quietly fill in missing connections.
The reader can’t.
That’s one reason a plot hole and weak story logic can be difficult to find while you’re developing or drafting a novel. You may see a perfectly reasonable chain of events because you already know how everything connects.
AI can be useful here, not as a plot fixer, but as a skeptical reader who keeps asking, “Why?”
A Plot Hole Isn’t Always a Missing Event
When writers hear “plot hole,” they may picture a glaring contradiction.
A character is locked inside a building in one chapter and inexplicably appears outside it in the next. A destroyed object suddenly reappears. Someone knows information she could not possibly know.
Those problems matter, but weak story logic can be much subtler.
Sometimes every event is technically possible, but the connection between events is weak.
A character makes a decision without enough motivation. A convenient coincidence solves a difficult problem. A later development depends on something the story never established.
The reader may not call any of these things a plot hole. She may simply stop believing the story.
Several kinds of questions can help uncover those problems.
Cause and effect
Ask what caused each important development.
Event B occurring after Event A does not necessarily mean Event A caused Event B.
The relationship may be obvious to you because you know what you intended. The reader needs enough information to understand—or eventually discover—the connection.
This is different from building your overall plot architecture. I covered that in Build a Plot That Holds Together.
Here, the question is narrower: Does this particular development logically follow from what the story has established?
Character knowledge
Characters can act only on information they possess—or on conclusions they could reasonably reach.
This creates an easy place for author knowledge to leak into character knowledge.
You may know who the antagonist is, where an object is hidden, or why another character behaved strangely. Your viewpoint character may know none of those things.
Ask how the character learned the information.
If you cannot answer that question without saying, “Well, I know it,” you may have found a problem.
Motivation
A character may be physically capable of doing something without having a convincing reason to do it.
Ask why this particular person would make this particular choice at this particular point in the story.
The answer does not need to be rational. People make emotional, impulsive, frightened, stubborn, and foolish choices all the time.
But the choice should make sense for the character. If an important action happens primarily because the plot needs the character to do it, readers may feel the machinery underneath the story.
Assumptions
Writers make invisible assumptions constantly. We assume a character can get somewhere in time. We assume someone has access to needed information. We assume one character will trust another.
Most assumptions are harmless.
Problems arise when the story depends on an assumption the reader has no reason to make.
A useful question is: “What must be true for this event to happen?”
Then examine each answer. You may discover that one of those supposedly true things has never actually been established.
Coincidence and convenience
Coincidences happen in fiction just as they happen in life. The problem is usually not that coincidence exists. It is how much work the coincidence does for the author.
A chance encounter that creates trouble can be perfectly believable. A string of lucky accidents that repeatedly solves the protagonist’s problems may feel convenient.
The more important the outcome, the more carefully you should examine what produces it.
Setup
Sometimes the logic works, but the reader hasn’t received enough information to recognize it.
That may mean you need setup rather than a different plot event. Perhaps you already know a character has a particular skill. If that ability suddenly saves her during a crisis, however, readers may wonder where it came from.
A small earlier indication may be enough.
Surprises are part of storytelling. The goal here is to make important developments feel possible after the reader understands them.
Ask AI to Question the Story, Not Fix It
This is where AI can be especially useful.
Instead of asking: “Are there any plot holes in my story?”
Give AI a specific section of your story development and ask it to interrogate the logic.
For example:
Review these connected story events as a skeptical reader. Identify places where cause and effect are unclear, a character appears to know something without explanation, motivation is insufficient, or an important development depends on an unsupported assumption. Explain why you flagged each issue. Do not rewrite or fix the story.
That final instruction matters. You are trying to uncover questions, not outsource answers.
You can also narrow the analysis further:
- What must be true for this event to happen?
- What information does this character need before making this decision?
- What caused this development?
- Where am I relying on coincidence or convenience?
- What assumptions am I making that a reader might not make?
- What needs to be established earlier for this event to feel believable?
These questions make AI show you where to look. Then you decide what the story needs.
Look at What Changed Downstream
One logic problem I’ve encountered in my own fiction development came from changing an earlier story decision.
The change itself worked.
The problem was that a later development still depended on the original version.
Because I knew both versions of the story, the connection did not immediately jump out at me. In my head, the later event still made sense.
On the page, the underlying assumption was no longer true.
That taught me to ask a question I now find particularly useful: If I change this, what else does it affect?
Changes can ripple surprisingly far through a novel.
Changing one fact may affect:
- what a character knows;
- what a character believes;
- why someone makes a decision;
- what resources are available;
- what another character can reasonably predict;
- what has already been established;
- what can logically happen later.
AI can help trace those dependencies as you develop or draft.
Give it the original assumption, the change you made, and the related developments you are concerned about. Ask which later events may depend on the old assumption.
You still need to evaluate the answer carefully. AI may see useful connections. It may also invent connections that do not exist.
Not Every AI Objection Is a Plot Hole
One danger of using AI as a skeptical reader is that it can become too skeptical.
If you ask it to find problems, it will try to find problems. That does not make every finding valid.
Suppose AI tells you a character’s action is illogical. Before changing anything, ask why.
- Maybe you failed to provide enough context.
- Maybe the character is intentionally making a poor decision.
- Maybe the unanswered question is part of a mystery.
- Maybe the reader is supposed to misunderstand what is happening at this point.
- Maybe genre expectations make the development perfectly reasonable.
- Or maybe AI found something you missed.
Treat the finding as a question to investigate, not a verdict. This is one of the most useful habits you can develop when using AI for fiction: ask it to explain its reasoning.
- If it identifies an unsupported assumption, ask which assumption.
- If it says a character should know something, ask exactly how the character could have learned it.
- If it calls an event unlikely, ask what information led to that conclusion.
AI’s explanation gives you something you can evaluate. Its conclusion alone doesn’t.
Don’t Try to Make Your Story Question-Proof
There is another trap here.
Once you start hunting for logic problems, you can begin trying to answer every conceivable question a reader might ask. That can lead to unnecessary explanations, excessive setup, or characters constantly explaining things readers already understand.
Fiction does not need to eliminate every question. Sometimes questions are exactly what you want.
Mystery, suspense, uncertainty, mistaken assumptions, withheld information, and incomplete character knowledge can all be intentional parts of a story.
The important distinction is between an unanswered question and an unanswerable one. An unanswered question makes the reader wonder what the answer is.
Weak story logic makes the reader wonder whether the author knows the answer.
Your job is to make sure the story has enough underlying logic to support what happens.
Story Logic Checklist
When you’re developing or drafting connected story events, use these questions to look for places that deserve another look.
Cause and effect
- What caused this event?
- Does the story establish that connection?
- Would the event still happen if the earlier event were removed?
- Am I confusing sequence with causation?
Character knowledge
- What does the character know at this point?
- How did the character learn it?
- Am I accidentally giving the character information only I know?
- Is the character drawing a conclusion she could reasonably reach?
Motivation
- Why does this character make this choice?
- Does the motivation fit what the story has established?
- Is the decision driven by the character—or by what I need the plot to do?
Assumptions and setup
- What must be true for this development to work?
- Have I established those conditions?
- Does the reader need more setup?
- Am I depending on an assumption the reader has no reason to make?
Coincidence and convenience
- Is coincidence creating trouble or conveniently eliminating it?
- Could the outcome arise more naturally from earlier choices and events?
- Am I using convenience repeatedly to keep the story moving?
Downstream changes
- Have I changed an earlier story fact or decision?
- Which later events still depend on the old version?
- Did that change affect knowledge, motivation, timing, resources, or assumptions?
You can use it to help you see the questions you might not have thought to ask.
That is the real advantage of using AI to find weak story logic. It gives you another perspective when you are too close to the story to see what your own knowledge has quietly filled in.
Then you decide whether anything needs to change.
Watch for the next article in our series on craft and story development. In it, we’ll narrow the focus again and look at what happens inside the individual building blocks of your novel: Write Stronger Scenes with AI.
For more guidance, see other writer’s guides in our series on craft and story development. We suggest starting with the first one, Use AI Without Giving Up Your Story.
Or for all the writer’s guides in one place, grab our book: Repurpose Your Author Content with AI (available on Amazon).
We hope you’ve found the writer’s guide strategies useful and motivating. We hope they’ll equip you with the insights and tools needed to help you succeed as a new author.
You might also enjoy some of our books:
AI Future Ready Skills for Indie Authors
Amazon KDP Made Easy: A Simple, Stress-Free System to Self-Publish Your First Book on Amazon
Writing is a journey of continuous learning and improvement. You don’t have to go it alone. We’re excited to continue the journey with you, providing guidance and encouragement every step of the way. Our goal is to provide essential insights and practical advice to help you navigate the writing world with increased confidence.
If you have a draft you want to publish and are wondering how AI can help, read: Is Your Book Ready to Self-Publish?
Don’t wait. Start today!
How can we help? To let us know, please fill out our Contact form.
Happy writing!